Skip to main content
Fervor Grade™  /  The CRO Index  /  Fervor Grade™ 2.5
National Site Inspection — Roofing — Canada & United States

Mr. Roof

A conversion audit of the highest-traffic organic pages across mrroof.com — measuring whether the website earns trust independent of brand equity.

Domain mrroof.com
Audit Date March 19, 2026
Pages Audited 5
76 /100 Weighted Score: B Grade / Passing
Executive Summary

The Mr. Roof Site Inspection

Mr. Roof brings 60+ years of roofing heritage, 500,000+ installations, and an industry-leading trust stack to a website that converts well on its strongest pages but leaves significant revenue on the table through a thin Location Finder, a trust-stripped Lead Capture page, and complete organic invisibility in its largest markets. The brand's conversion infrastructure is conditionally viable — strong at the top of the funnel, weakening as visitors move deeper toward commitment.

Overall Weighted Brand Score 66
Fervor Grade™ Interpretation

66/100 · Grade C — Conditional. Mr. Roof has the trust assets to compete nationally but its conversion infrastructure fails to deploy them consistently across the funnel. The Location Finder and Lead Capture pages both score in D-tier territory, dragging an otherwise competent brand into the conditional range.

Homepage 76 Location Finder 53 Location Page 74 Service Page 67 Lead Capture 53
Homepage 76 ×0.15 · wt. 11.4
Location Finder 53 ×0.20 · wt. 10.6
Location Page 74 ×0.30 · wt. 22.2
Service Page 67 ×0.20 · wt. 13.4
Lead Capture 53 ×0.15 · wt. 8.0

Methodology note. This audit applies the Fervor Grade™ 2.5 National Site Inspection framework to five key conversion pages on mrroof.com. Scoring categories: First Impression (/20), Trust & Credibility (/22), Lead Capture (/20), Mobile Experience (/15), Content & SEO (/15), Accessibility (/8). Pages are weighted by conversion funnel role: Homepage ×0.15, Location Finder ×0.20, Location Page ×0.30, Service Page ×0.20, Lead Capture ×0.15. Fervor Grade™ scores conversion infrastructure independent of brand equity.

Page 1 of 5 — Homepage

The Brand Platform

Homepage
https://www.mrroof.com
76 /100 B — Passing
Business Model Modifier applied. Mr. Roof operates as a franchise/multi-location brand under Crane Renovation Group. The absence of a single local phone number on the homepage is expected and not penalized. Lead routing via location selector is the appropriate pattern for this business model.
First Impression
16/20
Trust & Credibility
19/22
Lead Capture
15/20
Mobile Experience
11/15
Content & SEO
10/15
Accessibility
5/8
Page Total
76/100
✓ Pass — First Impression

Hero headline "Done in a day. Good for a lifetime." delivers a clear, differentiated value proposition in seven words. Supporting copy immediately explains the scope (roofing, siding, windows, gutters) and the guarantee (lifetime warranty). This is among the strongest hero messaging in the national roofing category.

✓ Pass — Trust & Credibility

The homepage stacks 60+ years in business, 500,000+ installations, 1,500+ five-star reviews, A+ BBB rating, Owens Corning Platinum certification, and Consumer Choice Awards spanning 23 years. This trust architecture exceeds virtually every competitor in the national roofing space.

✓ Pass — Lead Capture

Lead capture form is present on the homepage with name, phone, email, location selector, and service type fields. The 800 number is displayed prominently in the header. Multiple CTAs ("Get a FREE estimate," "Schedule," "Contact Us") provide varied entry points for different visitor intent levels.

✓ Pass — Trust & Credibility

Eight customer testimonials with names, star ratings, and Google/BBB verification badges provide strong social proof. The testimonials read authentically and cover different service experiences, adding credibility depth beyond aggregate ratings.

&x26A0; Warn — Content & SEO

Meta description ("Roof might be in our name but we do more than just roofing") is generic and does not contain the primary keyword "roofing contractor" or a conversion-oriented call to action. The title tag leads with "The Largest Residential Roofing Contractors" which prioritizes self-description over search intent.

&x26A0; Warn — Lead Capture

The lead capture form requires visitors to select their location from a dropdown before submitting. While appropriate for a multi-location brand, this adds friction. No inline form appears above the fold — visitors must scroll to find the primary conversion mechanism.

Page 2 of 5 — Location Finder

The Routing Layer

Location Finder
https://www.mrroof.com/locations/
53 /100 D — Probation
Business Model Modifier applied. As a franchise/multi-location brand, the Location Finder page is scored on its ability to route visitors to local conversion pages efficiently. The absence of a single local phone number is expected. However, the page is still expected to provide search/filter functionality and trust reinforcement.
First Impression
11/20
Trust & Credibility
10/22
Lead Capture
11/20
Mobile Experience
10/15
Content & SEO
7/15
Accessibility
4/8
Page Total
53/100
✓ Pass — Lead Capture

Each location card includes a direct phone number and links to a dedicated local page. The "Get A Free Estimate" and "Call" buttons provide two distinct conversion paths per location, reducing routing friction for visitors who already know their market.

✗ Issue — First Impression

No interactive map exists on the Location Finder page. Visitors see a static list of nine cities with no visual geographic context. For a brand operating across four states, this makes self-routing unnecessarily difficult — especially for visitors in suburban areas between metro markets.

✗ Issue — Trust & Credibility

Zero reviews, ratings, or social proof appear on the Location Finder page. The homepage displays 1,500+ five-star reviews and A+ BBB rating, but none of this trust architecture carries forward to the page that routes visitors to their local market. This is a critical trust gap at a high-intent decision point.

✗ Issue — Content & SEO

The page contains minimal content beyond location cards. No zip code search, no service area map, no filtering by service type. Meta description ("We proudly offer our roofing services throughout the Midwest") is geographically inaccurate — Mr. Roof serves Tennessee and Kentucky in addition to Midwest states.

&x26A0; Warn — Mobile Experience

On mobile, the nine location cards stack vertically with no search or filter. A mobile visitor must scroll through all locations to find their market. No geolocation detection or "find nearest location" functionality exists to accelerate routing.

✗ Issue — Lead Capture

No form exists on the Location Finder page itself. Visitors must click through to a local page or the /free-estimate/ page to submit their information. For a page carrying 20% of the weighted brand score, this represents a missed conversion opportunity at a high-intent routing point.

Page 3 of 5 — Location Page

The Local Conversion Page

Location Page — Nashville
https://www.mrroof.com/nashville/
74 /100 B — Passing
First Impression
15/20
Trust & Credibility
18/22
Lead Capture
15/20
Mobile Experience
11/15
Content & SEO
10/15
Accessibility
5/8
Page Total
74/100
✓ Pass — Trust & Credibility

The Nashville page displays a 4.9/5 rating from 345 reviews, A+ BBB accreditation, and Owens Corning Platinum Preferred Contractor status. Nine verified customer testimonials with Google and BBB badges provide authentic local social proof that reinforces the national brand promise at the market level.

✓ Pass — Lead Capture

Local phone number (615) 208-3245 is prominently displayed. Lead capture form is present with location pre-selected. A $1,000 off promotion and 0% financing for 6 years provide financial urgency. Multiple CTA placements ("Free Estimate," "Schedule," "Contact Us") cover different intent levels.

✓ Pass — First Impression

Local headline "Your Experienced Nashville Roofing Contractor" immediately establishes geographic relevance. The physical address (200 River Hills Dr) and local phone number signal a genuine local presence rather than a remote national brand.

&x26A0; Warn — Content & SEO

While the page includes local testimonials, much of the service description content appears templated across locations. The page lists service areas for all nine markets in the footer, diluting local SEO signals. Unique local content (team photos, Nashville-specific project galleries, local licensing info) is absent.

✗ Issue — Content & SEO

Mr. Roof Nashville does not appear on page one of Google for "roofing contractor Nashville." Don Kennedy Roofing, Nashville Roofing Company, Priority Roofing, and multiple local competitors dominate. Despite having 345 reviews and A+ BBB rating, the brand is organically invisible in its own market.

&x26A0; Warn — Mobile Experience

No sticky click-to-call bar appears on mobile. The local phone number exists in the header but requires scrolling back to the top to access it. For a page that drives the majority of local conversion intent, this creates unnecessary friction on mobile devices.

Page 4 of 5 — Primary Service Page

The Service Showcase

Roofing Services
https://www.mrroof.com/roofing/
67 /100 C — Conditional
First Impression
14/20
Trust & Credibility
17/22
Lead Capture
11/20
Mobile Experience
11/15
Content & SEO
9/15
Accessibility
5/8
Page Total
67/100
✓ Pass — Trust & Credibility

The service page deploys a comprehensive trust stack: Owens Corning Platinum Preferred certification, Roofer of the Year award, Guildmaster recognition, Best of Houzz Service, and Consumer Choice Awards spanning 22+ years. The lifetime transferable warranty is positioned as a key differentiator against local competitors who typically offer 5-10 year workmanship warranties.

✓ Pass — First Impression

Service categories (Roof Replacement, Roof Repair, Metal Roofing, Commercial Roofing) are clearly segmented with individual cards. The "Done in a Day" promise is reinforced on the service page, maintaining messaging consistency from the homepage. Financing (0% for 6 years) is prominently featured.

✗ Issue — Lead Capture

No inline form exists on the roofing service page. All "Get a Free Estimate" CTAs link away to /free-estimate/, forcing an additional page load and click before the visitor can convert. For the primary service page of a roofing company, this exit-to-convert pattern is a measurable friction point.

✗ Issue — Content & SEO

Despite claiming 500,000+ installations, the service page contains zero before/after project photos, no project gallery, and no case studies. The ~1,200-word page provides surface-level service descriptions without the depth needed to compete for informational search queries or establish technical authority.

&x26A0; Warn — Content & SEO

Meta description ("Roofing Services: Shingle Roofing, Metal Roofing, Repair and Commercial Roofing") reads as a keyword list rather than a compelling click-through invitation. No process timeline or step-by-step explanation is provided, despite "Done in a Day" being the brand's core differentiator.

&x26A0; Warn — Lead Capture

Nine customer testimonials appear near the bottom of the page, but they are positioned below the fold and after the primary CTA sections. Placing social proof before or adjacent to the conversion mechanism would reinforce trust at the decision point rather than after the visitor has already scrolled past it.

Page 5 of 5 — Lead Capture

The Conversion Endpoint

Lead Capture
https://www.mrroof.com/free-estimate/
53 /100 D — Probation
First Impression
11/20
Trust & Credibility
8/22
Lead Capture
14/20
Mobile Experience
10/15
Content & SEO
6/15
Accessibility
4/8
Page Total
53/100
✓ Pass — Lead Capture

The form is concise at five fields (Name, Phone, Email, Location, Service) with clear labeling. TCPA consent language is properly included with opt-out instructions. The (800) 884-9760 phone number provides an immediate alternative for visitors who prefer calling over filling out forms.

✗ Issue — Trust & Credibility

The Lead Capture page is almost entirely stripped of trust signals. No reviews, no star ratings, no BBB badge, no warranty mention, no "500,000+ installations" stat, no testimonials. The homepage deploys one of the strongest trust stacks in the roofing industry — and then abandons it entirely on the page where the visitor is being asked to hand over their personal information. This is the single most damaging conversion gap on the site.

✗ Issue — First Impression

The headline is simply "Free Estimate" with supporting copy "Fill out the form below and we will contact you as soon as possible." No value reinforcement, no urgency, no reminder of the lifetime warranty or "Done in a Day" promise. The page treats form submission as a transaction rather than the beginning of a relationship.

✗ Issue — Content & SEO

The page contains virtually no content beyond the form. No FAQ section addressing common objections ("How long does a roof replacement take?", "What does the warranty cover?"). No "what to expect" process description. No financing details. The page is a dead end for SEO and provides zero conversion support content.

&x26A0; Warn — Lead Capture

No "no obligation" or "no pressure" language appears near the form. No expectation-setting ("We'll call you within 2 hours" or "Your free estimate takes 30 minutes"). The Podium chat widget is referenced in code but its visibility and integration with the form flow is unclear.

&x26A0; Warn — Mobile Experience

The single-step form layout is functional on mobile, but the location dropdown with nine options and the service dropdown create additional taps on smaller screens. A multi-step form with conditional logic would reduce perceived complexity and improve mobile completion rates.

Strengths Identified

What's Done Well

Fervor Grade™ — Top Strengths

Mr. Roof Deploys a Trust Architecture That Most National Brands Cannot Replicate

  • ✓ Trust Stack Depth

    Across the homepage and location pages, Mr. Roof layers 60+ years of history, 500,000+ installations, 1,500+ five-star reviews, A+ BBB accreditation, Owens Corning Platinum certification, and 23 years of Consumer Choice Awards into a trust architecture that exceeds virtually every competitor in the national roofing category. 48% of homeowners say trust is their biggest struggle when hiring contractors — Mr. Roof addresses this systematically.

  • ✓ Value Proposition Clarity

    "Done in a day. Good for a lifetime." is a seven-word value proposition that communicates speed, quality, and warranty in a single memorable phrase. This messaging is reinforced consistently across the homepage, service pages, and location pages — a level of brand discipline that most multi-location contractors fail to maintain.

  • ✓ Local Reputation Management

    The Nashville location page displays a 4.9/5 rating from 345 verified reviews with individual testimonials carrying Google and BBB verification badges. This local social proof creates market-specific trust that national brands often fail to build. The 90% Facebook recommendation rate adds a secondary trust layer from a platform homeowners frequently check.

  • ✓ Lifetime Transferable Warranty

    The warranty offering is a genuine competitive moat. While most local roofers offer 5-10 year workmanship warranties, Mr. Roof's lifetime transferable warranty backed by Owens Corning materials eliminates one of the homeowner's primary objections. The transferability adds real estate value — a decision-stage differentiator that few competitors can match.

  • ✓ Financial Friction Reduction

    The 0% interest for 6 years financing offer, prominently featured alongside a $1,000 off promotion on location pages, directly addresses the payment objection that kills conversions in the $13,000+ average project range. Financing is not buried in a footer link — it is positioned as a primary conversion driver.

Critical Conversion Failures

Conversion Killers

Fervor Grade™ — Most Damaging Findings

A World-Class Trust Stack That Disappears at the Moment of Conversion

  • ✗ Trust-Stripped Lead Capture Page

    The /free-estimate/ page — the single page where every CTA on the site sends visitors — contains zero trust signals. No reviews, no star ratings, no BBB badge, no warranty language, no social proof of any kind. Mr. Roof builds one of the strongest trust stacks in the industry across its homepage and location pages, then strips it entirely from the page where visitors are asked to submit personal information. This trust vacuum at the conversion endpoint is the most damaging finding in this audit.

  • ✗ Anemic Location Finder (53/100)

    The /locations/ page serves as the primary routing mechanism for a multi-location brand but provides no interactive map, no zip code search, no geolocation detection, and no trust reinforcement. With 20% of the weighted brand score riding on this page, its D-tier performance drags the entire brand score down by approximately 6-8 points versus what a well-built location finder would deliver.

  • ✗ Organic Invisibility in Core Markets

    Mr. Roof Nashville does not appear on page one of Google for "roofing contractor Nashville" despite maintaining a 4.9/5 rating from 345 reviews and A+ BBB accreditation. This organic invisibility means the brand is dependent on paid traffic and direct brand searches to generate leads — while local competitors capture the high-intent non-branded search volume for free.

  • ✗ No Inline Forms on Service or Location Finder Pages

    The roofing service page and location finder page both require visitors to click away to /free-estimate/ before they can convert. Every additional click in a conversion funnel reduces completion rates. With 62.45% of traffic coming from mobile devices, this exit-to-convert pattern compounds friction on smaller screens where page loads take longer and back-button abandonment is higher.

  • ✗ 500,000 Installations, Zero Project Photos

    Despite claiming half a million completed installations, neither the service page nor the location pages contain before/after project galleries, case studies, or visual proof of work. 94% of first impressions are design-related, and homeowners making $13,000 decisions expect to see completed work. The absence of visual proof forces the brand to rely entirely on text-based claims and third-party reviews.

48% of homeowners say trust is their biggest struggle when hiring contractors — Houzz (2025). Mr. Roof builds this trust on the homepage, then abandons it on the page that asks for the commitment.
Revenue Projection

Revenue Impact

Conversion Gap Calculation

Step 1 — Traffic Baseline (estimated): Mr. Roof's national site receives an estimated 60,000–90,000 monthly organic visitors across all location pages and service pages, based on domain authority, indexed page count, and market presence across 9 metro areas. The Nashville location page alone likely captures 4,000–6,000 monthly visits.

Step 2 — Conversion Benchmarks (published): LocaliQ (2025) reports roofing industry benchmarks of $10.70 CPC, 3.70% CVR, and $13,000 average project value. A site converting at benchmark would turn 60,000 monthly visitors into 2,220 leads, of which approximately 15–20% would close.

Step 3 — Conversion Gap Argument (observed): The trust-stripped lead capture page (8/22 on Trust & Credibility), anemic location finder (53/100), and missing inline forms on service pages create systemic conversion friction. Conservative estimate: the site converts 0.5–1.0 percentage points below the 3.70% benchmark due to these infrastructure gaps, losing 300–600 leads per month nationally.

Step 4 — Financial Range:

Assumptions

VariableValueSource / Rationale
Monthly organic visitors (est.)75,000Estimate based on 9 metro markets, domain authority, indexed pages ±30%
Industry benchmark CVR3.70%LocaliQ 2025 Roofing benchmark
Estimated current CVR2.70–3.20%Adjusted for observed conversion infrastructure gaps
Conversion gap0.50–1.00%Trust-stripped lead capture + missing inline forms + thin location finder
Lost leads/month375–75075,000 × (0.50–1.00%)
Lead-to-close rate18%Industry standard for roofing (high-ticket residential)
Average project value$13,000LocaliQ 2025 Roofing benchmark
Monthly revenue left on the table $878K–$1.76M
Annual cost of inaction $10.5M–$21.1M

Step 5 — Paid Traffic Argument: At $10.70 CPC (LocaliQ 2025), the 375–750 lost organic leads would cost $108,000–$216,000/month to replace via Google Ads. That is $1.3M–$2.6M annually in paid media spend that proper conversion infrastructure would eliminate — money that could fund a complete website rebuild several times over.

Revenue projections are estimates based on published industry benchmarks and third-party traffic estimates. They should not be interpreted as guarantees.

Immediate Opportunities

Quick Wins

Four high-impact, low-effort improvements ranked by expected conversion lift.

1

Add trust signals to the /free-estimate/ page

The lead capture page scores 8/22 on Trust & Credibility because it contains zero social proof. Adding the star rating (4.9/5), review count (1,500+), A+ BBB badge, and one testimonial near the form takes 1–2 hours to implement and directly addresses the most damaging finding in this audit. The trust assets already exist — they just need to be placed on the conversion endpoint.

48% of homeowners say trust is their biggest struggle hiring contractors — Houzz (2025)
2

Embed inline lead capture forms on service and location finder pages

The roofing service page and location finder page both force visitors to click away to /free-estimate/. Embedding the same 5-field form inline on these pages eliminates one navigation step per conversion. The form already exists as a WPForms widget — duplicating it onto these pages requires minimal development effort.

22% of users abandon forms because the process is too long — Baymard Institute (2024)
3

Add interactive map and zip code search to /locations/

The Location Finder page lists nine cities without geographic context or search functionality. Adding a Google Maps embed with clickable pins and a zip code search field would accelerate self-routing — especially for mobile visitors in suburban areas between metro markets. This is a standard WordPress plugin implementation.

53% of mobile users abandon sites taking >3 seconds — Google/SOASTA (2017)
4

Add sticky click-to-call bar on mobile location pages

Location pages display the local phone number in the header but do not provide a persistent click-to-call element on mobile. With 62.45% of traffic coming from mobile devices, a sticky footer bar showing the local phone number and a "Call Now" button would capture high-intent visitors who prefer voice contact over form submission.

62.45% of all internet traffic comes from mobile devices — Statcounter (2025)
Competitive Context

Strengths, Vulnerabilities, and Competitive Position

National Brand vs. Local Competitors

Strengths:

  • Trust volume advantage: 500,000+ installations and 1,500+ reviews across markets dwarfs the review counts of local competitors like Don Kennedy Roofing or Nashville Roofing Company, who typically have 50–200 reviews.
  • Warranty differentiation: Lifetime transferable warranty backed by Owens Corning is a structural advantage that single-location contractors cannot replicate without manufacturer partnerships at scale.
  • Multi-service bundling: The ability to offer roofing, siding, windows, gutters, and masonry under one roof (with 0% financing across all) creates cross-sell and bundling opportunities that single-trade competitors cannot match.
  • Financial infrastructure: 0% for 6 years financing and $1,000 off promotions reduce the payment objection in a $13,000 average project market more effectively than most local competitors who offer limited or no financing.

Vulnerabilities:

  • Organic invisibility: Despite brand strength, Mr. Roof does not appear on page one for "roofing contractor Nashville" or equivalent high-intent local queries. Local competitors like Don Kennedy Roofing (since 1978) and Nashville Roofing Company dominate organic results, capturing non-branded search traffic for free.
  • BBB complaint volume: Nashville BBB profile notes "due to the volume of complaints filed against this business, BBB only publishes the details for 70% of the total complaints filed." This is a visible trust vulnerability that local competitors do not share.
  • Template content risk: Location pages share significant template content across markets, which creates thin content risk for local SEO and makes it harder to outrank locally-rooted competitors with unique, market-specific content.
  • No visual proof of work: Local competitors increasingly feature project galleries and before/after photos. Mr. Roof's absence of visual portfolio content cedes this trust-building opportunity to smaller competitors who showcase their work more aggressively.
Verdict

The Summary

Inspection Verdict — Mr. Roof

Mr. Roof possesses one of the strongest trust stacks in the national roofing category — 60+ years, 500,000 installations, Owens Corning Platinum certification, lifetime transferable warranty, and verified reviews numbering in the thousands. The brand's problem is not what it has built. The problem is where it deploys it. The trust architecture that makes the homepage and location pages compelling disappears entirely at the conversion endpoint, and the Location Finder — the critical routing layer for a multi-location brand — operates as a static list rather than an intelligent routing tool.

The 66/100 score reflects a brand that has invested in reputation but underinvested in conversion infrastructure. The gap between Mr. Roof's brand equity and its website's ability to convert that equity into booked appointments is the most significant finding in this audit. Fixing the lead capture page and location finder would likely move this score into B-tier territory within weeks, not months. The assets exist. They just need to be deployed where the decisions are made.

PRIMARY ISSUE Trust signals vanish at the conversion endpoint — the /free-estimate/ page where every CTA sends traffic contains zero social proof, zero reviews, and zero warranty language.
RECOMMENDED FIRST ACTION Add the existing trust stack (star rating, review count, BBB badge, one testimonial, warranty mention) to the /free-estimate/ page. Implementation time: 1–2 hours. Expected impact: measurable lift in form completion rate within the first week.
Scoring Summary

Weighted Brand Score Calculation

PageRaw ScoreWeightWeighted
Homepage 76/100 ×0.15 11.4
Location Finder 53/100 ×0.20 10.6
Location Page 74/100 ×0.30 22.2
Service Page 67/100 ×0.20 13.4
Lead Capture 53/100 ×0.15 8.0
Overall Weighted Brand Score 66 / 100
Audit Framework

Modifiers Applied

ModifierTriggerScore Impact
Business Model Modifier Franchise/multi-location model (Crane Renovation Group) — no single local phone expected on national pages Applied to Homepage + Location Finder only. Location selector dropdown accepted as appropriate lead routing mechanism.
Data Integrity

Data Confidence Statement

Observed with certainty: Page content, form fields, CTA placement, trust signal presence/absence, meta tags, navigation structure, testimonial count and verification badges, phone numbers, TCPA consent language, financing offers, location count, SERP position for "roofing contractor Nashville" (Mr. Roof absent from page 1), review ratings on Houzz (4.5–5.0/5), BBB accreditation status, Yelp review counts.

Estimated with published benchmarks: Monthly organic traffic volume (75,000 ±30%), conversion rate gap (0.50–1.00%), lead-to-close rate (18%), revenue impact calculations, mobile traffic share (62.45% per Statcounter 2025), CPC ($10.70 per LocaliQ 2025), average project value ($13,000 per LocaliQ 2025).

Sources

Citations

[1] BrightLocal (2026). "97% of consumers read reviews before hiring a local business."
[2] Houzz (2025). "48% of homeowners say trust is their biggest struggle hiring contractors."
[3] Houzz (2025). "60%+ of homeowners check the contractor's website before hiring."
[4] Statcounter (2025). "62.45% of all internet traffic comes from mobile devices."
[5] Northumbria/Sheffield Universities (2004). "94% of first impressions are design-related."
[6] Baymard Institute (2024). "22% of users abandon forms because the process is too long."
[7] Google/SOASTA (2017). "53% of mobile users abandon sites taking longer than 3 seconds."
[8] WebAIM (2025). "96.3% of homepages have detectable WCAG failures."

Related Inspections

Get My Site Inspection